Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Presidential immunity is necessary

Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:58 am
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68472 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:58 am
The President is like a mob boss.

He gives orders that:

Get people killed

steal from people

extort people

Theses are crimes he does in the interest of the U.S. It's just part of the job. It's why Carter was bad at the job.

There are 3 main categories of actions that a president can take:

1. Those in the interest of the country.

2. Those in the interest of him personally/politically.

3. Those that are both.


Only those in the second category are open to possible criminal charges. Category 1 and 3 get a pass every time.


President Trump alleged actions around January 6 were clearly category 1 or 3.

There were red flags everywhere around the election. He had to do what was needed to make sure a high-tech coup wasn't happening.

This was justified to try and keep America from a bad situation.

And looking bad, Joe Biden is definitely the worst of a bad situation.


Viva Trump!




Posted by mahdragonz
Member since Jun 2013
6956 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 9:01 am to
Then if that is the case, you can't say we should uphold Christian values.

You can't have both.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424226 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 9:02 am to
Nobody is arguing that the Executive shouldn't have limited immunity for official Executive acts, at least I don't think anyone is.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22294 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 9:11 am to
quote:

2. Those in the interest of him personally

This is the heart of the SCOTUS ruling. The question they repeatedly asked the DOJ was “which body gets to decide personal acts vs official”.

The DOJ thinks they should get to decide, because that way they can continue their legal agenda against Trump.

SCOTUS is going to shut that down. They will send this back to the lower courts with instructions. Possible outcome is that the judicial branch will be responsible for deciding personal acts vs private.
Posted by ShermanTxTiger
Broussard, La
Member since Oct 2007
10915 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 9:30 am to
Obama could be tried for treason for giving Iran 150 billion without going through Congress. Let the SCOTUS reject Trumps immunity and a GOP. It could come back to haunt the Dems.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424226 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Possible outcome is that the judicial branch will be responsible for deciding personal acts vs private.

Possible? More like "essentially guaranteed".

They already perform this role and have for a long time. The President is not the only government official to whom this immunity applies. This is just the first time the immunity has been litigated for a President within the criminal context (Nixon covered a lot of the civil areas involved).

I have no idea why the DOJ argued what it did, but federal courts have already covered this in detail.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68472 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 9:42 am to

Trump's actions were not solely for his personal benefit.

At worse it was dual purpose and dual purpose gets a pass.
Posted by AubieinNC2009
Mountain NC
Member since Dec 2018
5020 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 10:13 am to
quote:

2. Those in the interest of him personally/politically.


It should be those in the best interest of the USA.

Should be nothing personal about any elected office, that is what leads to corruption
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36772 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 10:18 am to
You're right we need to make sure Joe Biden gains clear legal immunity for everything he's done while in office.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68472 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Should be nothing personal about any elected office, that is what leads to corruption


Decisions that are good for the country are going to be good for him politically.

There is no way to separate them and that is why dual purpose decisions that are also crimes get a pass.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram