re: Lawfare: how is this defined, and how can it be (legally) stopped?

quote:

---

10+ definitions just in this thread alone. Which is it?

---

Several of them mesh. There are a few odd ones, which you tellingly encourage, which don't mesh. You rather nonsensically tried to limit categorization of lawfare to criminal cases knowing that limitation undermines the general premise.

i.e., "Well, if you're excluding 'those cases' for nonsensical reasons, then you must be willing to exclude the following cases as well..."

The thing most disturbing about this thread is your own refusal to acknowledge not just lawfare's existence as the weaponization of law IAW Marc Elias et al., but the irreparable damage it can do if our idiot courts continue to allow it.