- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawfare: how is this defined, and how can it be (legally) stopped?
Posted on 4/27/24 at 11:25 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/27/24 at 11:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:I appreciate the 'suggestion.'
I would suggest y'all keep the definition of lawfare to criminal only.
The answer is "no."
Sorry.
There may be no better, more obvious example of lawfare than lawyers conspiring with an extremist legislature to change a law for just one year to accommodate a bullshite charge which was then brought into an absurdly partisan Kangaroo Court in order to gain a desirable verdict.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 11:26 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
an absurdly partisan Kangaroo Court
Well now all civil lawsuits are potential "lawfare" b/c the juries are always the first complaint by the loser
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
This board is about to get real big.
This post was edited on 4/27/24 at 11:27 am
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)