- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawfare: how is this defined, and how can it be (legally) stopped?
Posted on 4/27/24 at 11:16 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 4/27/24 at 11:16 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
I wonder how many people actually believe E Jean's "rape" story
Again, are we talking criminal or civil?
I would suggest y'all keep the definition of lawfare to criminal only.
quote:
locked dressing room, but somehow she got in WITH Trump, her supposed outfit was not manufactured until two years after the date of her supposed assault, she ran from the dressing room with her tights pulled down, but no one on the entire floor noticed, no security cam footage, the identical story appeared on a Law and Order episode, even down to the actual store, Bergdorf Goodman's.
That's up to the jury to decide.
Again, be careful how you propose a universal definition (and solution).
Imagine if NY had "loser pays". Trump would have to deal with the judgment AND her attorney's fees.
1
Posted on 4/27/24 at 11:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:I appreciate the 'suggestion.'
I would suggest y'all keep the definition of lawfare to criminal only.
The answer is "no."
Sorry.
There may be no better, more obvious example of lawfare than lawyers conspiring with an extremist legislature to change a law for just one year to accommodate a bullshite charge which was then brought into an absurdly partisan Kangaroo Court in order to gain a desirable verdict.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News