Started By
Message

re: Lawfare: how is this defined, and how can it be (legally) stopped?

Posted on 4/27/24 at 11:11 am to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124535 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 11:11 am to
quote:

charges against Trump are all acting in good faith and seeking nothing other than justice.
Right.
I wonder how many people actually believe E Jean's "rape" story ... locked dressing room, but somehow she got in WITH Trump, her supposed outfit was not manufactured until two years after the date of her supposed assault, she ran from the dressing room with her tights pulled down, but no one on the entire floor noticed, no security cam footage, the identical story appeared on a Law and Order episode, even down to the actual store, Bergdorf Goodman's.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425065 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 11:16 am to
quote:

I wonder how many people actually believe E Jean's "rape" story

Again, are we talking criminal or civil?

I would suggest y'all keep the definition of lawfare to criminal only.

quote:

locked dressing room, but somehow she got in WITH Trump, her supposed outfit was not manufactured until two years after the date of her supposed assault, she ran from the dressing room with her tights pulled down, but no one on the entire floor noticed, no security cam footage, the identical story appeared on a Law and Order episode, even down to the actual store, Bergdorf Goodman's.

That's up to the jury to decide.

Again, be careful how you propose a universal definition (and solution).

Imagine if NY had "loser pays". Trump would have to deal with the judgment AND her attorney's fees.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram