- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawfare: how is this defined, and how can it be (legally) stopped?
Posted on 4/27/24 at 11:07 am to OceanMan
Posted on 4/27/24 at 11:07 am to OceanMan
quote:
A skill you are going out of your way to demonstrate you don’t possess.
We haven't even established if legitimacy of the litigation invalidates a designation of "lawfare". People keep changing and shifting and relying on concepts like whataboutism instead of establishing first principles.
2
Posted on 4/27/24 at 11:14 am to SlowFlowPro
I define lawfare as a dog whistle type of phrase used to signal between maga supporters that something is unfair to them or someone they are required to support.
How does that definition hold up?
How does that definition hold up?
Posted on 4/27/24 at 11:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
We haven't even established if legitimacy of the litigation invalidates a designation of "lawfare". People keep changing and shifting and relying on concepts like whataboutism instead of establishing first principles.
Maybe because you are rejecting the premise that lawfare is driven by motivation. Backing into legitimacy, which is a subjective measure has little to do with motivation.
And stop with the “whataboutisms”, your use of “Patriots won’t like…” several times in this thread shows you aren’t above them yourself.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News