re: Lawfare: how is this defined, and how can it be (legally) stopped?

quote:

---

quote:Wrong, “criminals” implies they are targeting a crime, not an individual.

Tomato tomato.

---

How ironic is this quote? We have to go through your mastercalss of the malleability of the term “lawfare”, but the distinction I made above is not meaningful?

What a clown.

quote:

---

No. I'm willing to accept that these prosecutions are targeted. But that means we're going to have to bring tens of thousands of prosecutions into the discussion as also being targeted

---

no that’s not what it means. We don’t ever have to have straw man arguments.

quote:

---

I don't think Patriots are going to want to do that, in particular. They're refusal to do so, however, largely invalidates this "lawfare" idea.

---

Non partisan. We all see your agenda but you. It’s embarrassing.

quote:

---

The frick does a prosecutor have to do with a civil lawsuit?

---

Hers what the AG of New York has to say about it.

quote:

---

Politicians are politicians. Your argument only works if you're claiming the criminal prosecutions are not legitimate, even if a jury disagrees with you.

---

Take the L.