- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawfare: how is this defined, and how can it be (legally) stopped?
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:44 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:44 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
It certainly should be.
How can you achieve this?
As a universal solution across criminal, civil, and administrative litigation.
quote:
U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney has the right idea.
Defendants "cannot be selected for prosecution because of their repugnant speech and beliefs over those who committed the same" offence.
So a whataboutism defense?
That's not going to work. BLM would EAT if that was the standard.
1
Posted on 4/27/24 at 9:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:NO!
So a whataboutism defense?
An unequal application of the law defense. Equal justice under law is a phrase engraved on the West Pediment of the Supreme Court Building. It is a 14th Amendment tenet. "Whataboutism" is not. You know that.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News