- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawfare: how is this defined, and how can it be (legally) stopped?
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:29 am to SCLibertarian
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:29 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
Imagine if a MTG-like prosecutor was elected and began to charge her political opposition with various crimes based on novel interpretations of the statutes at hand.
The only case of Trump's this even applies to is the NY case.
The GA, DC, and Florida cases don't involve any novel theories.
This is also why the NY case is regarded as by far the weakest one.
1
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Of course they do. The thesis that a sitting POTUS cannot exercise options under legal loopholes to challenge an election is absolutely "novel," and stupid. The idea that an ex-POTUS should be prosecuted by the DOJ for something "no reasonable prosecutor" would pursue is absolutely "novel," and dangerous.
The GA, DC, and Florida cases don't involve any novel theories.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News