- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawfare: how is this defined, and how can it be (legally) stopped?
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:27 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:It certainly should be.
Is lawfare litigation illegal?
quote:U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney has the right idea.
how can it be (legally) stopped?
Defendants "cannot be selected for prosecution because of their repugnant speech and beliefs over those who committed the same" offence.
1
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:44 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
It certainly should be.
How can you achieve this?
As a universal solution across criminal, civil, and administrative litigation.
quote:
U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney has the right idea.
Defendants "cannot be selected for prosecution because of their repugnant speech and beliefs over those who committed the same" offence.
So a whataboutism defense?
That's not going to work. BLM would EAT if that was the standard.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News