- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawfare: how is this defined, and how can it be (legally) stopped?
Posted on 4/27/24 at 7:08 am to KiwiHead
Posted on 4/27/24 at 7:08 am to KiwiHead
quote:
Hey I don't like a policy or new law, let's shop and see if we can find a sympathetic circuit like the Fifth or the Ninth and either delay it's implementation or overturn it.
You don't see a difference between constitutional challenges and the bastardization of laws for politically targeted criminal prosecutions?
quote:
both sides try to grasp for any advantage
Please list the "lawfare" of the right...
There is no "both sides" here.
Other than Kyle Rittenhouse, BLM/Antifa suffered zero consequences for their 2020 rioting. Similarly, leftists that have OCCUPIED the Capitol routinely skirt prosecution. Yet, J6 "insurrectionists" languish in prison without trial, have received ridiculous sentences or are still being hunted down by the FBI to this day.
This is not a "both sides" issue. But, I suspect it is going to become one.
2
Posted on 4/27/24 at 7:09 am to udtiger
quote:
This is not a "both sides" issue. But, I suspect it is going to become one.
One can only hope.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 7:19 am to udtiger
I do see the problem and that is what I'm getting at. But Republicans are not innocent. Democrats just attempt to use it a lot more.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News