re: Lawfare: how is this defined, and how can it be (legally) stopped?

Imagine if a MTG-like prosecutor was elected and began to charge her political opposition with various crimes based on novel interpretations of the statutes at hand. The same folks on this board who don't seem to oppose lawfare when it comes to Trump would be skyscreaming about how dictatorial and authoritarian it was. Hell, there are folks on here who claim Eileen Cannon is a partisan hack, while simultaneously maintaining that the NYC and DC leftists who adjudicate other cases against Trump and his allies are perfectly objective.