re: Lawfare: how is this defined, and how can it be (legally) stopped?

quote:

---

That clown isn’t interested in defining lawfare because he’s intent on insisting that Lawfare isn’t a real thing and all of this targeting of Trump is perfectly normal. His only interest here is responding to everyone’s definitions and examples of lawfare with “nuh uh that’s not lawfare”.

---

That's right!

Imagine if a MTG-like prosecutor was elected and began to charge her political opposition with various crimes based on novel interpretations of the statutes at hand. The same folks on this board who don't seem to oppose lawfare when it comes to Trump would be skyscreaming about how dictatorial and authoritarian it was. Hell, there are folks on here who claim Eileen Cannon is a partisan hack, while simultaneously maintaining that the NYC and DC leftists who adjudicate other cases against Trump and his allies are perfectly objective.