Started By
Message

re: Lawfare: how is this defined, and how can it be (legally) stopped?

Posted on 4/26/24 at 5:10 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425081 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

They change a law specifically to target a political opponent from the other party,

If this were true, it would have been changed after her suit was filed.

I said the change was bullshite, but it's the law now, and that law has ensnared non-Republicans.

Just because something is bullshite doesn't make it partisan.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131558 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

If this were true, it would have been changed after her suit was filed.


I believe the limitations were sunsetted.

If not for the E Jean Carrol case it was for the Bragg case.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23347 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

If this were true


It is

quote:

it would have been changed after her suit was filed.


Doesn't mean anything

quote:

I said the change was bullshite


But you said it wasn't partisan, which is nuts.

quote:

law has ensnared non-Republicans.


Doesn't change intent,

quote:

Just because something is bullshite doesn't make it partisan


No one is saying that. Thanks
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83753 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

If this were true, it would have been changed after her suit was filed.
Why do you assume this?
quote:

Just because something is bullshite doesn't make it partisan.
YOU DONT THINK THE EFFORTS AGAINST TRUMP ARE PARTISAN?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram