- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawfare: how is this defined, and how can it be (legally) stopped?
Posted on 4/26/24 at 5:04 pm to SCLibertarian
Posted on 4/26/24 at 5:04 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
The NY legislature expanded the SOL specifically so E. Jean Carroll could file suit against Donald Trump. T
But they didn't close it after and Democrats have faced the brunt. How is that partisan? I agree it's bullshite, but it's snagged non-Republicans, too.
quote:
The fraud case would have either been dismissed or the damages judgment would have been monumentally lower in almost every other jurisdiction in this country.
That is because no other jurisdictions have that law, and it's not new or anything. It's been litigated quite extensively, too, so Trump isn't alone in the brunt. How is it lawfare?
3
Posted on 4/26/24 at 5:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How is that partisan?
They change a law specifically to target a political opponent from the other party,
Sfp: "how is that partisan? and I totally haven't lost my mind"
Posted on 4/26/24 at 5:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Are those snagged worth snagging to get Trump?
But they didn't close it after and Democrats have faced the brunt. How is that partisan? I agree it's bullshite, but it's snagged non-Republicans, too.
If the answer is yes, seems like lawfare to me.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That is because no other jurisdictions have that law, and it's not new or anything. It's been litigated quite extensively, too, so Trump isn't alone in the brunt. How is it lawfare?
You are incredibly stupid. We know that it is lawfare, because the prosecutor campaigned to target Donald Trump.
quote:
"We will use every area of the law to investigate President Trump and his business transactions and that of his family as well,"
It started with the individual, not the law. This behavior brings shame to the entire legal profession. You are truly an embarrassment trying to run cover for a targeted legal agenda against an individual.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News