Started By
Message

re: Joe Rogan Podcast with Bart Sibrel - who here believes the Moon Landing was a hoax?

Posted on 4/26/24 at 7:40 am to
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
26695 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 7:40 am to
quote:

Buzz Aldrin who apparently brings back what was claimed to be a moon rock that was later analyzed to be petrified wood.


Is there a link to this?

Don't you think if they're going to use BS moon rocks, they'd use something other than petrified wood?

Damn, you'd think they'd be smarter than that..

I looked it up and it turns out to be a "moon rock" from a Dutch museum they tested...

quote:

The Dutch national museum said Thursday that one of its prized possessions, a rock supposedly brought back from the moon by U.S. astronauts, is just a piece of petrified wood.


quote:

Rijksmuseum spokeswoman Xandra van Gelder, who oversaw the investigation that proved the piece was a fake, said the museum will keep it anyway as a curiosity.


NBC news

They even admitted it was fake...

Someone probably stole it and replaced it with petrified wood...or the ambassador gave them some bs as a memento..

This is a moon rock...



This is what they had in the museum...


This post was edited on 4/26/24 at 7:55 am
Posted by Asleepinthecove
Member since Jan 2023
939 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 7:43 am to
quote:

quote:Buzz Aldrin who apparently brings back what was claimed to be a moon rock that was later analyzed to be petrified wood. Is there a link to this? Don't you think if they're going to use BS moon rocks, they'd use something other than petrified wood? Damn, you'd think they'd be smarter than that..


LINK
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111119 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Someone probably stole it and replaced it with petrified wood...or the ambassador gave them some bs as a memento..
This is what Rogan said.


The moon rock to the Dutch president or whoever it was is definitely curious and makes you think, but it's not definitive proof.


That's why the Sebril guy did a really bad job. He wouldn't concede anything like that to Rogan every time Rogan mentioned something isn't 100% proof. He also didn't even want Rogan to speak from a standpoint of thinking about it from the opposite side. He clearly just wanted Rogan to go along with everything he said with no pushback.


I could be, actually hope I am wrong here. But at the end Rogan said he wants to get someone on the other side to go point by point to debunk Sebril and offered Sebril to come back and debate whoever that person may be, and Sebril said he would. But he seemed like the type of dude that doesn't want that smoke and wouldn't actually want to debate someone who knows what they're talking about.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram