- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
Posted on 4/27/24 at 10:37 am to Robin Masters
Posted on 4/27/24 at 10:37 am to Robin Masters
quote:
And he was acquitted
If your argument was correct, it would have never gotten that far
Did you read the case you linked?
quote:
We find no merit in appellant's argument. Rather, we agree with the seventh circuit that this portion of section 3 was intended "to assure that after impeachment a trial on criminal charges is not foreclosed by the principle of double jeopardy."
![](https://media.tenor.com/gV6lGNwO64oAAAAM/jerry-seinfeld-laughing.gif)
*ETA: I hadn't even read that case prior to you posting it. Even double jeopardy was referenced. Oh my.
This post was edited on 4/27/24 at 10:40 am
Posted on 4/27/24 at 10:40 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
We find no merit in appellant's argument. Rather, we agree with the seventh circuit that this portion of section 3 was intended "to assure that after impeachment a trial on criminal charges is not foreclosed by the principle of double jeopardy."
Well they charged an innocent man so their opinion is like yours: shite.
This post was edited on 4/27/24 at 10:41 am
Posted on 4/27/24 at 10:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
ETA: I hadn't even read that case prior to you posting it. Even double jeopardy was referenced. Oh my.
I’m not even a lawyer and my interpretation was the same as the side who won.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)