Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity

Posted on 4/27/24 at 9:55 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425100 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Does the bar know you struggle to educate laypeople about the law on a chitchat board?

I asked you for specific words. You have yet to give me any. I have given you like 5 chances to do so. I can't improve IQ or honesty in laypeople.

Oh, and

quote:

The question is the process, not immunity. Immunity isn't really specifically applicable to this discussion.

If a conviction in the Senate, following impeachment, is required (based on your colon theory) to permit criminal prosecution, how was Hastings tried criminally first?

Are you now going to accept that a conviction in the Senate has no bearing on related criminal prosecution?
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30172 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 10:16 am to
quote:

how was Hastings tried criminally first?


justia

quote:

In this case, appellant contends that as an active federal judge he has an absolute right not to be tried in a federal court unless and until he is impeached and convicted by Congress


And he was acquitted

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram