- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
Posted on 4/26/24 at 2:06 pm to Robin Masters
Posted on 4/26/24 at 2:06 pm to Robin Masters
Also, I will repeat this since you ignored it:
You do know this clause isn't specific to the President, right? People have been impeached and removed in real cases.
How was Hastings removed by the Senate AFTER he was acquitted in criminal court, if your stance is that a conviction by the Senate is required first prior to criminal prosecution?
quote:
Look at Alcee Hastings.
1. Acquitted at criminal trial in 1983
2. Impeached and removed in 1989 for overlapping behavior to the 1983 trial
If your system is correct, how in the hell did THAT happen?
You do know this clause isn't specific to the President, right? People have been impeached and removed in real cases.
How was Hastings removed by the Senate AFTER he was acquitted in criminal court, if your stance is that a conviction by the Senate is required first prior to criminal prosecution?
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How was Hastings removed by the Senate AFTER he was acquitted in criminal court, if your stance is that a conviction by the Senate is required first prior to criminal prosecution?
Do judges have immunity from taking bribes?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News