Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity

Posted on 4/26/24 at 2:03 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423173 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Why would they clarify the party wasn’t protected by double jeopardy by not bothering to reference double jeopardy or the 5th?

That isn't necessary by using the specific "conviction" language re: Senate "trial". That's the entire point.

quote:

Odd their clarification doesn’t reference any of the things you claim they were written to illuminate.

It doesn't need to.

I am having to explain the impact of the clear language to people who are obfuscating the words and adding wording that doesn't exist.

The only question, at this point, is if you're doing it intentionally/dishonestly or out of ignorance.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram