- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The 2 are related but conviction is the disqualifying action. Why would they write a discussion about the differences in a criminal prosecution/conviction and a Senate prosecution/conviction by referencing the HOR impeachment process?
Why would they clarify the party wasn’t protected by double jeopardy by not bothering to reference double jeopardy or the 5th? Odd their clarification doesn’t reference any of the things you claim they were written to illuminate.
1
Posted on 4/26/24 at 2:03 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
Why would they clarify the party wasn’t protected by double jeopardy by not bothering to reference double jeopardy or the 5th?
That isn't necessary by using the specific "conviction" language re: Senate "trial". That's the entire point.
quote:
Odd their clarification doesn’t reference any of the things you claim they were written to illuminate.
It doesn't need to.
I am having to explain the impact of the clear language to people who are obfuscating the words and adding wording that doesn't exist.
The only question, at this point, is if you're doing it intentionally/dishonestly or out of ignorance.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News