- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:36 pm to moneyg
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:36 pm to moneyg
quote:
If that clause was meant to address double jeopardy, why would it reference the party convicted instead of the party impeached?
Think about that for a second.
quote:
Certainly double jeopardy is applicable to the party who would be acquitted too.
Sure, but the example of a prior conviction is better for clarify.
It's the same argument for both.
Again, Hastings literally argued double jeopardy at his Senate trial
1
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If that clause was meant to address double jeopardy, why would it reference the party convicted instead of the party impeached?
Think about that for a second.
How about you just answer it.
quote:
Sure, but the example of a prior conviction is better for clarify.
That's your answer? quote:
Again, Hastings literally argued double jeopardy at his Senate trial
and? Explain how that is relevant.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News