- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:33 pm to Robin Masters
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:33 pm to Robin Masters
What specific language makes a Senate "conviction" a requirement to future prosecution?
You do know that we have impeachment examples outside of POTUS, right?
Look at Alcee Hastings.
1. Acquitted at criminal trial in 1983
2. Impeached and removed in 1989 for overlapping behavior to the 1983 trial
If your system is correct, how in the hell did THAT happen?
You do know that we have impeachment examples outside of POTUS, right?
Look at Alcee Hastings.
1. Acquitted at criminal trial in 1983
2. Impeached and removed in 1989 for overlapping behavior to the 1983 trial
If your system is correct, how in the hell did THAT happen?
1
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What specific language makes a Senate "conviction" a requirement to future prosecution?
When they define the party eligible for indictment, ect as the “party convicted”. Who else besides someone convicted by the senate would this apply to?
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News