Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity

Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:23 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424260 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

What do you mean?

If he's not facing double jeopardy, why would a clarification regarding the impacts of a Senate "conviction" on double jeopardy matter to him? It doesn't apply to him either way.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30077 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

he's not facing double jeopardy, why would a clarification regarding the impacts of a Senate "conviction" on double jeopardy matter to him? It doesn't apply to him either way.


It’s not. It’s clarifying that while the impeachment conviction only carries loss of job the “party convicted” can be tried criminally. Thats why there is a colon, because the latter defines an exception to the former.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram