- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The one clarifying that "conviction" is not one for criminal matters,
lWhere does it clarify that? All I see is that it limits the punishments available.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The one clarifying that "conviction" is not one for criminal matters, ie, double jeopardy does not apply?
If that clause was meant to address double jeopardy, why would it reference the party convicted instead of the party impeached? Certainly double jeopardy is applicable to the party who would be acquitted too. Yet, it doesn't address that.
Why do you think they referenced the "party convicted". You haven't explained that in a meaningful way yet.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News