- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:04 pm to Robin Masters
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:04 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
What is a convicted party?
In the framing of the clause, a person who was impeached and faced "trial" in the Senate and was "convicted"
Which language creates a requirement that the above "conviction" is required for a criminal trial?
2
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Which language creates a requirement that the above "conviction" is required for a criminal trial?
When they say a “convicted party” can be eligible for indictment, ect. Do you think they added “convicted” that just for funzies or do you think it might mean something?
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Which language creates a requirement that the above "conviction" is required for a criminal trial?
Why would the following clause be needed at all then?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News