Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity

Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:53 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424260 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:53 am to
That's why there is little dispute/debate about the immunity over official acts.

The question is whether the USSC will give absolute immunity or limit it to official acts.

If they do, then it becomes an issue of his alleged behavior and where it falls.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68472 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:00 am to
quote:

If they do, then it becomes an issue of his alleged behavior and where it falls.


And his sincere beliefs and if he was being advised by attorneys.

No one thinks that Trump did not believe election irregularities were afoot and deserved more time to be examined.

It would be his duty as president to look into it.
Posted by JoeHackett
Member since Aug 2016
4379 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:16 am to
quote:

The question is whether the USSC will give absolute immunity or limit it to official acts.



I can't imagine them granting absolute immunity. I think a lot of people are going to be disappointed by their opinion. It seems like they'll just say that official acts are immune and then try and set up a way for future courts/prosecutors to determine what is and isn't an official act.

Without any facts in Trump's case, I don't see how they'll rule specifically about him. They can't determine whether what he did was in his official capacity if they don't have anything other than allegations at this point.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram