Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity

Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:38 pm to
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30172 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

Google “nevertheless”


Google “convicted”.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80515 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:45 pm to
I think that was the first drop of pigeon shite on the chess board. I’m out.
Posted by bayouboo
Member since Jan 2007
2240 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:56 pm to
The biggest issue/loophole in the absolute immunity argument is that a President, in the last hour of their Term, could coordinate the murder of their political opponent, jail all members of Congress from the opposing party along with all the Supreme Court Justices. This would create a situation where Congress would not have time to impeach/remove from office with no high court to rule on any challenge.

Impeachment cannot be the only remedy to hold a President accountable for a crime.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425081 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Google “convicted”.

They are differentiating "conviction" in the Senate from "conviction" at trial, to ensure there are no issues with Double Jeopardy

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram