Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity

Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:19 pm to
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80515 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

Except they wouldn’t be “convicted” until they are found guilty in an impeachment proceeding so they wouldn’t be subject to criminal proceedings.


Yeah man, you’re just missing this one. I think you’re in good faith but this is just simple reading and sentence structure. Good luck with it.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30172 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

Yeah man, you’re just missing this one. I think you’re in good faith but this is just simple reading and sentence structure. Good luck with it.


Anything is possible I guess and I’m certainly not arguing just to be a contrarian but you’re right I’m not seeing it and to me it makes perfect sense that you must first be convicted in the senate to then be eligible for criminal indictment as opposed to what you say it means.


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram