- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:07 pm to Robin Masters
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:07 pm to Robin Masters
Oh ok. I misunderstood your post.
If you’re “still subject” to something, you’re subject to it even if the something doesn’t happen.
If you wear purple panties to work tomorrow, you’re still subject to me showing up and punching you in the face.
I can still show up and punch you in the face even if you don’t wear purple panties.
All the original statement says is you wearing purple panties doesn’t insulate you from nor preclude me from punching you in the face.
If you’re “still subject” to something, you’re subject to it even if the something doesn’t happen.
If you wear purple panties to work tomorrow, you’re still subject to me showing up and punching you in the face.
I can still show up and punch you in the face even if you don’t wear purple panties.
All the original statement says is you wearing purple panties doesn’t insulate you from nor preclude me from punching you in the face.
This post was edited on 4/25/24 at 9:15 pm
1
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:10 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
you’re “still subject” to something, you’re subject to it even if the something doesn’t happen.
Sure. If you’re the “party convicted”. It doesn’t say “party” or “party accused”. It’s specifically qualified the eligible party as one who has been convicted.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News