Started By
Message

re: Would We Be Better Off With Terry Fontenot?

Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:22 am to
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16497 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:22 am to
Considering the fact that we would be stuck with Loomis regardless, I prefer Harley & Ireland. Don't know much about the new Pro personnel guy, Parenton, that took over Fontenot's role.

If you told me I could have Fontenot and we could walk from Loomis, I would not mind rolling the dice on Fontenot. If we don't see the improvements from Fontenot, I have faith the front office would move on; I don't think Loomis leaves until Loomis wants to leave
Posted by bstaceyau19
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2022
372 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 1:12 pm to
They drafted a tight end with no one to throw him the ball.

They drafted a running back at #8 at a time in the NFL when running backs have no value.

They said, "Desmond Ritter...that's our guy"

Kirk Cousins is a good sign, but he is not the second coming of Pat Mahomes that many in the media portray him as. He is an older version of Derek Carr with a weaker arm.

They have needed defensive help for years and have not addressed it.

At least the saints knew they had an issue at OT and tried to address is with Trevor Penning; they just whiffed on the pick. Better that than to ignore positions of need to draft a running back.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram