- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 9th Circuit rules Cops can force you to use fingerprint to unlock phone
Posted on 4/19/24 at 3:13 pm to AubieinNC2009
Posted on 4/19/24 at 3:13 pm to AubieinNC2009
Ridiculous. They should at least be required to obtain a warrant first.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 3:18 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:Also an interesting question, but under the Fourth Amendment. As I recall, the defendant did not raise that issue in this case because it dealt with a parole violation or something of the sort..
They should at least be required to obtain a warrant first.
IMO, if the state does not obtain such a warrant first, this is probably the better argument. The problem (for a defendant) is that it is not difficult to obtain that warrant, and the data on the phone is not going to be changing n the short time it takes to do so. The state takes a few hours (or days) to get the warrant, then they put your thumb on the pad or flash the camera at your face. Voila, they are in.
This post was edited on 4/19/24 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 4/19/24 at 5:22 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Ridiculous. They should at least be required to obtain a warrant first.
The contents of the phone are still protected by the 4th Amendment, so a warrant would still be required, although it appears that in this case he waived his 4th Amendment rights as a condition of his parole for a prior offense.
This post was edited on 4/19/24 at 5:26 pm
Posted on 4/20/24 at 9:14 am to imjustafatkid
quote:It is a two-step process.
They should at least be required to obtain a warrant first.
First, is law enforcement entitled to see the contents of your phone? That is a Fourth Amendment issue.
Second, if so, are you required to “assist” them in gaining access TO your phone. That is a Fifth Amendment issue.
Because this appeal relates to a parolee, only issue two was in play in this case.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News