- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PJ Woodland - Time to address the Elephant in the Room
Posted on 4/10/24 at 8:13 am to deathvalleyfreak43
Posted on 4/10/24 at 8:13 am to deathvalleyfreak43
quote:
I seem to remember all the national signing day recruiting experts on this board were pissed when he signed
I don't but I may have just put that off as guys being pissy, we get that. A guy like Woodland should always be looked at as at least a good depth piece with the potential to be much more.
quote:
He has the ideal build for corner.. just needs to add some weight.
He was listed as 5'11" as a recruit, I don't think that is ideal height but he may have grown a bit. But if he has speed and cover skills the only drawback at 5'11" is covering the taller receivers on 50/50 balls.
2
Posted on 4/10/24 at 8:36 am to mdomingue
quote:
A guy like Woodland should always be looked at as at least a good depth piece with the potential to be much more.
Disagree, Woodland is a take in any class. Causey is definitely a depth piece though. A player like Woodland is a take in any class. Causey is definitely a depth piece though.
I think the main issues that posters had was losing two 4* recruits in the first place. Even if both had underwhelming senior years and their rankings slipped some.
Posted on 4/10/24 at 9:30 am to mdomingue
quote:
He was listed as 5'11" as a recruit, I don't think that is ideal height but he may have grown a bit. But if he has speed and cover skills the only drawback at 5'11" is covering the taller receivers on 50/50 balls.
5'11 while not the "ideal" height is not short. If he was 5'9 then sure but 5'11 is not that concerning.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News