- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Special counsel urges Supreme Court to reject Trump’s immunity claim
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:39 pm to BBONDS25
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:39 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
To say because he is making this argument that it is admission of anything is ridiculous. You should feel bad for posting something so ignorant.
You should sue your elementary school teachers because it’s obvious that you can’t read.
In the outside chance you can read, go re-read what I wrote.
3
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:41 pm to Indefatigable
quote:The best part is ... the cretins BamaAtl parrots have weaponized our legal system BananaRepublic-style against political opponents. It is literally the kind of conduct he misattributes to Trump.
The best part is that Trump didn’t really do anything.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:41 pm to TBoy
You are so lost; Presidential immunity exists specifically so the opposition can’t “Trump up” charges for political reasons. Which is EXACTLY what the Biden DOJ is doing!
Everyone can see this trash!
Everyone can see this trash!
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:43 pm to TBoy
I want to vomit but I agree with your limited point there. Some of Trump’s legal arguments here are just laughably ridiculous—most notably “absolute” immunity and the impeachment/double jeopardy bullshite.
Both are just awful, and his team asserting them only undermines their more legitimate defenses.
Both are just awful, and his team asserting them only undermines their more legitimate defenses.
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:43 pm to loogaroo
Questioning a corrupt presidential election is not just something Killery and other Dems can do, but Trump can do it too....
If the USSC can't see this they are pretty stupid
If the USSC can't see this they are pretty stupid
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:46 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Nothing that any person or group of people involved did or could have done would have resulted in an overthrow of the government. Literally none of it.
Hell, the Congress reconvened hours later
I don't know why they cannot/will not get this through their skulls.
It can't be any clearer.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:46 pm to Datbawwwww
quote:
Presidential immunity exists specifically so the opposition can’t “Trump up” charges for political reasons.
No one disagrees.
The “meh” side of Trump’s case is that they are wanting to argue that anything at all he does as POTUS is immune from prosecution. That’s just….wrong.
POTUS. immunity only extends to official acts.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:47 pm to TBoy
quote:Good Lord! The irony.
it’s obvious that you can’t read
Did you attempt to cite your statement yet?
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:48 pm to Indefatigable
quote:Link?
they are wanting to argue that anything at all he does as POTUS is immune
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:48 pm to loogaroo
quote:
don't know why they cannot/will not get this through their skulls. It can't be any clearer.
Oh they are aware. They find it politically expedient to pretend otherwise.
Remember how it took about 36-48 hours post J6 before every single Democrat and media person started simultaneously calling it an “insurrection”.
They huddled and decided the 14th Amendment would suit their purpose.
It’s all hyperbole preying on the abject stupidity of the American electorate
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:49 pm to NC_Tigah
They didn’t assert absolute immunity? If not then ok.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:50 pm to Indefatigable
quote:Regarding POTUS duties.
They didn’t assert absolute immunity? If not then ok.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:52 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Regarding POTUS duties.
Then I have no issue with that argument, I was under the impression that they argued it applied to all actions while he was POTUS, regardless of whether it was an official act. Probably have shite mixed up.
That said, I’ll maintain my point as to the double jeopardy argument. It’s legitimately one of the dumbest legal arguments I have ever seen.
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 1:57 pm
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:06 pm to Indefatigable
I disagree, this is just the first and most obvious question (can he even be charged?) that needs to be answered; they will know to what extent Presidential immunity is offered, from there they have a stronger defense position.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:39 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
I thought you were going to look up seditious conspiracy before you started yapping again.
I posted the code section for seditious conspiracy and also the completely separate code section for insurrection. They are completely different crimes you absolute moron.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:42 pm to TBoy
quote:
You should sue your elementary school teachers because it’s obvious that you can’t read. In the outside chance you can read, go re-read what I wrote.
I read what you wrote. If you didn’t mean the words you typed, that isn’t a me problem. You’re ignorance of the existence of the legal strategy of arguing in the alternative isn’t a me problem. What is a me problem is that a complete moron useful idiot like you votes and your vote counts just as much as mine. 
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:43 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Had Pence gone along with Trump's coup attempt it would have been a subversion of the laws and the Constitution, in service of keeping a loser in the White House after he knew he'd lost.
Please tell me you're Marie Harf. She said the exact same thing word for word on Outnumbered earlier and got kunt punted across the studio. There is no reasoning with you people
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:53 pm to BamaAtl
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:56 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Not in a way that was going to be reviewable or change the outcome.
bullshite
Pennsylvania passed elections laws without changing the state constitution. . A crime In a Just world and a bill that was overturned by the courts In 2022.
You spread MSM lies. It must get old being so wrong every time
Posted on 4/11/24 at 6:11 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Trump used existing rules and processes in an attempt to have anti-Constitutional elections investigated.
Which existing rules covered storming the Capitol with a violent mob and violating the Constitution to remain in power?
Page 10 of 14
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News