- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Special counsel urges Supreme Court to reject Trump’s immunity claim
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:30 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:30 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
And then I learned that there is no such thing as "presidential immunity" during the Clinton impeachment.
Wait. You think immunity from criminal prosecution was part of the Clinton impeachment?
you dumb idiot. quote:
That's funny, in elementary school I was taught that no one was above the law.
So your elementary teacher taught you that immunity as a legal concept did not exist in any for or fashion? Either you’re a liar or your teacher was a complete moron.
1
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:31 pm to GBPackTigers
quote:
Many states broke election laws but there was “ no standing” to prosecute. All Trump wanted was to get to the bottom of the laws that were broken.
You're discussing 3 separate things
1. There were civil lawsuits brought by parties with no standing
2. Civil lawsuits wouldn't "prosecute" anyone
3. Trump's governmental investigatory power is via the DOJ, who did their own investigation. Otherwise, he could bring suits (which he did, and lost).
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:31 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Not in a way that was going to be reviewable or change the outcome.
Not relevant, and no way you could possibly know that. The FACT is there were illegal votes counted. You stupid moron.
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:31 pm to loogaroo
Can a sitting President order the military to arrest the SC Justices along with the opposing party’s nominee for President and hold them in Cuba indefinitely while ignoring all current laws?
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:34 pm to loogaroo
A guy using novel prosecution techniques (and slapped down before by SCOTUS for it) is asking for someone else’s novel argument to be ruled against.
What a piece of shite this guy is.
What a piece of shite this guy is.
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:34 pm to bayouboo
We’ll find out January 20th, 2025
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I wish I could change my name to "cloud"
Is that because you like to give cover?
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:37 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
There were no legal alternate electors on January 6th, 2021.
Wrong.
Is the problem that you don't understand what we're discussing, or are you gullible enough that you believe the lies you've been fed? Because what I said is correct - not a single State submitted valid, legal alternate electors. Every State submitted only 1 proper slate of electors.
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:38 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
The FACT is there were illegal votes counted.
There were. A few dozen across the country, all from Republicans trying to get Trump elected.
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:42 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Is the problem that you don't understand what we're discussing, or are you gullible enough that you believe the lies you've been fed? Because what I said is correct - not a single State submitted valid, legal alternate electors. Every State submitted only 1 proper slate of electors.
Alternate electors are not illegal. So when you said there were no “legal alternate electors” that is a legally incorrect statement.
Also…let’s not stop talking about your completely false allegation that a single
person was charged with insurrection.
You have proven time and again that you possess absolutely zero legal acumen. Yet you opine with arrogance from a place of complete ignorance.
You are a caricature.
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:43 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
There were. A few dozen across the country, all from Republicans trying to get Trump elected.
Not according to the Wisconsin Supreme Court and the US 3rd Circuit of Appeals. Of course you didn’t know about those rulings. Because you are a useful idiot that is ignorant to basic facts. You moron.
This post was edited on 4/10/24 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:46 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The crowd present on J6 was intended to show a gutless Pence that there was massive political support for him
Indeed, they were suggesting supporting Pence by the neck:
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:47 pm to BamaAtl
BS....More crap from the rookies that make up law. Any Executive Powers do not end until he legally is out of office. Quit watching the View for your trash.
He was in charge of insuring the Constitution was acted on properly.
Elementary School ......you are full of crap .....
He was in charge of insuring the Constitution was acted on properly.
Elementary School ......you are full of crap .....
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:51 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Irrelevant. The premise was Pence would simply leave questionable states envelopes unopened. Neither candidate would then have a majority, and the issue would be passed to the House for determination.
There was no way within existing law for Pence to challenge the particular slates of electors - each state only sent one certified slate
quote:100% false. Refusal to hear a case does not remotely equate to such a finding.
Additionally, dozens of court cases had shown no underlying fraud worth overturning an entire election.
quote:100% false, and stupid. Trump did not want Pence to overturn squat you imbecile. Trump wanted the House to do an investigation as to why multiple states carried out elections in breach of their constitutions, and whether their actions yielded a lawful result.
Trump wanted Pence to overturn the election and set up a scenario in which Trump, the loser, was declared the winner in violation of our laws and Constitution.
At no juncture would an election have been overturned, because at no juncture would a final result have been tallied until the House issued its finding.
This post was edited on 4/10/24 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:54 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:Because Pence announced in advance his decision to allow a shite election to move forward unchallenged, and uninvestigated.
Indeed, they were suggesting supporting Pence by the neck:
This post was edited on 4/10/24 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:57 pm to NC_Tigah
When should we expect a decision from the USSC?
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:59 pm to loogaroo
Trump’s lawyers urge Supreme Court to uphold Trump’s immunity claim
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:59 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Wait. You think immunity from criminal prosecution was part of the Clinton impeachment?
Didn't he try to claim immunity from a harassment charge?
quote:
So your elementary teacher taught you that immunity as a legal concept did not exist in any for or fashion?
I had several elementary school teachers, and no, none of them ever taught anything about presidential immunity.
quote:
Either you’re a liar or your teacher was a complete moron.
OR, they just didn't teach those legal concepts to children 6-11 years old.
Posted on 4/10/24 at 1:21 pm to TDTOM
quote:Yeah?
When should we expect a decision from the USSC?
Here's some perspective ...
Posted on 4/10/24 at 1:30 pm to BamaAtl
And yet you thought the 2016 election was stolen. You concocted the whole Russia, Russia, Russia to try to overturn that election.
Page 6 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News