re: Through sworn testimony today in GA, 147,000 votes are invalid if the law is followed.

quote:

---

Meaning he should be, but the Marxists aren't giving up the Whitehouse...ever. They will continue to warp the law to their favor and hide behind it. By any means necessary.

---

but they have to. Trump is a threat to democracy. and literally Hitler.

The State of Georgia was sued by three separate Democratic groups, one of which was led by Stacy Abrams. They were orchestrated by Clinton-acolyte and democrat attorney Marc Elias.

Months before the election , a settlement resulted in SoS Rafffensberger quietly authorizing a few word changes in the language pertaining to Mail-in Ballots and their eligibility. Note the distinction between Mail-in ballots and Absentee Ballots in this instance.

The language change …. resulted in a loophole. As long as the signature on the mail-in ballot REQUEST SUBMISSION matched the signature on the eventual Mail-in Ballot, no further validation was required.

Absentee Ballots were managed different … in that election workers were matching signatures against state voter role signatures , not Mail-in Request form signatures.

That means a single individual could theoretically take advantage with Mail-ins :
1) sign twenty different names to twenty different Mail-in Ballot Request forms,
2) receive 20 different Ballots under the names used (unpurged voters in Fulton?)
3) which would each match the Ballot Request signatures …because it’s all the same author …. just voting multiple times.

I suspect this what may have enabled the 2000Mules grift

It didn’t mean they weren’t on the voter roles, it just meant no signature match was required for them.

Only one of the ways it went down in Georgia ….

It should be noted that Kemp was fully aware of the settlement that Raffensberger reached with the 3 parties that sued the State …… many months before the election.

quote:

---

cadillacattack

---

I am very impressed with your insight and it sounds pretty detailed. Are you working in that sphere?

quote:

---

Laches

---

It is funny how coordinated that term was across so many courts. First time in my life hearing it, and it was everywhere. Not in 2000. Not in 2016. But, after year of planning how to get Trump out, suddenly this term pops up over and over.

I stinks. Crooked Judges and lawyers.

quote:

---

but I do know that the courts looked at the cases and found nothing there

---

If we make them follow every little vagary of election law,

1) it’s hard
2) it really cuts into the time allowed for defrauding the voters
3) it makes it harder to defraud the voters.

Ergo, they ain’t doing none of that shite.

quote:

---

I do know that the courts looked at the cases and found nothing there.

---

The courts looked at OJ and said he didn't kill anyone.

Even you don't believe that.

Imagine believing Biden legitimately won Georgia