- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is the Libertarian Party of Louisianan a real thing?
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:00 pm to BuckyCheese
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:00 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
"What I do not like is illegals being able to own guns while numbers of Americans are not."
If none are violent felons, they should be able to have as much as they want.
Thats how we roll here in this country. Big scary freedom. Its awesome.
2
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:01 pm to dgnx6
quote:
How do you do a background check on an undocumented person?
You don’t, you call authorities and deport them.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:04 pm to momentoftruth87
what if they have asylum paperwork filed?
This post was edited on 3/21/24 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:04 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
If none are violent felons, they should be able to have as much as they want.
You put a qualifier on there that is not in the constitution Roger...
As long as immigrants lawfully enter, as quoted in the opinion SFP quoted, I have no problem with them being armed. The flood coming across the border is not entering legally.
*I'm of the opinion a citizen should be able to own a fully functional tank if they want.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:06 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
You put a qualifier on there that is not in the constitution Roger...
My personal view is everyone, including ex cons have the right to self defend.
Daddy govt dont see it that way.
The point was if all are clean
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:08 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Thats how we roll here in this country. Big scary freedom. Its awesome.
Tell that to the people in California, Illinois, and New York. The Supreme Court has allowed those states to violate the 2A for generations. Of course that's for US citizens. The rights of criminal illegals won't be violated, because that is (D)ifferent.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:09 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
The point was if all are clean
They’re not. They break the law when they step foot in our country.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:11 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
The point was if all are clean
You aren't clean if you are in this country illegally. You aren't clean if you claim asylum, but came through another country to get here. You aren't clean if you claim asylum and don't meet several other criteria. You aren't clean if you claim asylum, but just came here for a better life.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You need to read the Constitution
The constitution was written for citizens and doesn't address illegals. The US government has unqualified authority regarding our borders and if foreign nationals can enter or not. Only Congress has the constitutional power to regulate everything else. Congress can make laws regarding illegals that are unconstitutional when applied to citizens. There is no congressional law saying illegals can own a firearm. Illegals have very limited constitutional rights. SCOTUS has ruled illegals have a right to due process before they are deported. Woke judges cannot legislate from the bench.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:21 pm to troyt37
quote:
You aren't clean if you are in this country illegally.
What about seeking asyum?
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:22 pm to troyt37
quote:
Tell that to the people in California, Illinois, and New York.
States with strong gun laws and wishy washy results.
If you notice people are leaving those states in droves.
This post was edited on 3/21/24 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:23 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
What about seeking asyum?
Why wouldn’t they just get weapons in their own country to protect themselves? Isn’t the premise safety for asylum seekers?
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:24 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
Why wouldn’t they just get weapons in their own country to protect themselves?
An enterprising American (The way they used to be built) would buy a bunch of Bear Creek ARs, set up a booth at the border, mark it up 100% and proift.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:26 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I find it interesting that all of a sudden people on this board are screaming for more gun control.
I'm in full support of gun control. It's very important to help you hit what you're aiming at.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:27 pm to Snipe
quote:
I'm in full support of gun control. It's very important to help you hit what you're aiming at.
Thanks for the reminder...
I'll need to sell ammo at my AR booth at the border.Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:31 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
What about seeking asyum?
On Aug. 3, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California’s order in East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Biden, 18-cv-06810 (N.D. Cal.), vacating the Circumvention of Lawful Pathways (CLP) rule. At this time and while the stay remains in place, USCIS will continue to apply the CLP rule.
Under the rule, certain individuals who enter the United States through its southwest land border or adjacent coastal borders are presumed to be ineligible for asylum, unless they can demonstrate an exception to the rule or rebut the presumption. Individuals are encouraged to use lawful, safe, and orderly pathways to come to the United States.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:35 pm to Category5
quote:
Under the rule, certain individuals who enter the United States through its southwest land border or adjacent coastal borders are presumed to be ineligible for asylum
What about these?
quote:
Specifically, at the end of fiscal year 2023, there were 937,611 pending asylum applications in U.S. Immigration Court2.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:40 pm to SPT
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:46 pm to Y.A. Tittle
We do have Rules of Engagement.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:50 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Has the Biden administration ever followed the law?
Page 10 of 11
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News