Started By
Message

re: Playoff Tie Controversy

Posted on 12/26/23 at 3:04 pm to
Posted by lance814
Member since Feb 2013
717 posts
Posted on 12/26/23 at 3:04 pm to
Why would yall decide bench points are more important than higher seed? I think the reason espn does it that ways is because there isn’t a “home field advantage”, so it makes sense that the higher seed moves on.

If he's been in the league since the beginning and was aware of the tiebreaker rules, then it should be the rules in y’all separate file. If not, it should be the rules on the website.

Also, how did y’all have this issue years again and not adjust to fractional scoring? Sounds like a lazy commish
This post was edited on 12/26/23 at 3:06 pm
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
9086 posts
Posted on 12/26/23 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Why would yall decide bench points are more important than higher seed?


Because regular season results should have no bearing on the playoffs. Once the playoffs start, everyone is on equal footing. The bench players are at least on your team and have results that can be tallied for the week.

quote:

If he's been in the league since the beginning and was aware of the tiebreaker rules, then it should be the rules in y’all separate file. If not, it should be the rules on the website.


Not only was he in the league, he was the original commissioner.

quote:

Also, how did y’all have this issue years again and not adjust to fractional scoring? Sounds like a lazy commish


The old people in our league don't like changes unless they feel like they benefit from them and vote common sense down.
This post was edited on 12/26/23 at 3:21 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram