Started By
Message

re: Mission Impossible: Dead Reckoning Discussion Thread. Spoilers allowed now

Posted on 7/5/23 at 1:46 pm to
Posted by jlovel7
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
21373 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

have never seen one mission impossible. Might need to download


The first two (and sort of the third) are vastly different from 4-6. You almost have to fight through them. There were big gaps in the series early on before sequels became more regularized. If you don’t like the first 2, don’t cut out the series. Like someone else said, they get better and better.

ETA: I think 3 is really the bridge between the two parts of the series. It has elements from both. But once ghost protocol came out they just went to a whole new level.

Adding what others have said. The main draw of 3 is Phillip Seymour Hoffmanns villain. Easily my favorite of the series.
This post was edited on 7/5/23 at 2:22 pm
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51738 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 1:51 pm to
Completely agree. The past 3 are the great ones, although I do love Hoffmans villain in the third film.
Posted by muttenstein
Member since Oct 2012
2568 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 1:52 pm to
One was ok, two was really bad. Three with Phillip Seymour Hoffman was fantastic...Four - Six are on another world.
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 7/9/23 at 1:08 am to
I always thought they messed up killing Emilio Estevez. He would have been great in the series
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram