Started By
Message

re: Walt Disney's Pixar targets 'Lightyear' execs among 75 job cuts

Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:52 am to
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150908 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:52 am to
quote:

Using the real Buzz probably doubles what they made on the movie. It’s not complicated.

What do you mean the real Buzz? Do you mean the toy, or Tim Allen’s voice? Because this character was neither of those things. It would’ve been nice bad they used Allen, but I get why they went in a different direction since it’s what the toy was based on.

What killed that movie was the Disney woke stupidity and negative press due to that IMO.
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
72444 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 12:11 pm to
I mean the toy

I understand it’s a different character and movie, but that’s not what kids know. You can’t say say this is a Buzz Lightyear movie and trot out something kids are fully unfamiliar with. Just make a different character all together if that’s your idea. It was a really dumb premise imo.

I didn’t see the movie like I said but I guarantee it’s a better draw if you use the toy Buzz.
This post was edited on 6/4/23 at 12:12 pm
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71558 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

What do you mean the real Buzz? Do you mean the toy, or Tim Allen’s voice? Because this character was neither of those things. It would’ve been nice bad they used Allen, but I get why they went in a different direction since it’s what the toy was based on.

What killed that movie was the Disney woke stupidity and negative press due to that IMO.



Not having Tim Allen voicing it caused me not to see it. Very dumb, unforced error.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram