- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nobel prize 'horse paste' that costs 3c/dose reduces Covid death by 70%, infections by 44%
Posted on 3/15/22 at 10:52 am to winkchance
Posted on 3/15/22 at 10:52 am to winkchance
Y’all MF’ers who took that experimental therapeutic are screwed. Good luck with your future health.
Took Ivermectin prophylactically when wife got COVID, never got sick. And she recovered in a couple days.
It’s crimInal what the government & medical community forced upon the American people. I hope their judgment day comes soon.
Took Ivermectin prophylactically when wife got COVID, never got sick. And she recovered in a couple days.
It’s crimInal what the government & medical community forced upon the American people. I hope their judgment day comes soon.
0
Posted on 3/15/22 at 11:06 am to Jack Ruby
quote:
Nobel prize 'horse paste' that costs 3c/dose reduces Covid death by 70%, infections by 44%
Maybe if they wanted it to be taken seriously as a medicine for humans, they shouldn't have called it "horse paste."
Posted on 3/15/22 at 11:08 am to MojoGuyPan
quote:
Maybe if they wanted it to be taken seriously as a medicine for humans, they shouldn't have called it "horse paste."
You serious Clark?? MSM called it that when they were trying to bash it. People say it now tongue in cheek.
Posted on 3/15/22 at 11:08 am to Jack Ruby
Were people making fun of Ivermectin as a treatment or the fact that people were going to Tractor Supply to buy horse ivermectin and dosing based upon a facebook prescriptions?
Posted on 3/15/22 at 11:09 am to MojoGuyPan
quote:You do realize there are forms that are prescribed to humans, correct?
Maybe if they wanted it to be taken seriously as a medicine for humans, they shouldn't have called it "horse paste."
Posted on 3/15/22 at 11:18 am to Jack Ruby
Those journals are shite. Nice try.
If ivermectin and whatever else trumpys want to say work like HCQ or bleach, how come when trump was being treated for Covid he got none of that. Zilch. The leader of the free world. The most powerful man in the world. Gets none of that. Time to move along and let the real scientists work. Alex Jones might need an intern retard.
If ivermectin and whatever else trumpys want to say work like HCQ or bleach, how come when trump was being treated for Covid he got none of that. Zilch. The leader of the free world. The most powerful man in the world. Gets none of that. Time to move along and let the real scientists work. Alex Jones might need an intern retard.
Posted on 3/15/22 at 11:28 am to joe_cotton
quote:Show me where Trump said "bleach."
or bleach
Posted on 3/15/22 at 11:28 am to Twenty 49
quote:
We put a little Ivermectin in the kids' breakfast smoothies once a week. For the one that is breast feeding, the wife rubs a little on her nipple. They haven't had pinkeye or covid since.
Posted on 3/15/22 at 11:34 am to Jack Ruby
the first two are retrospective studies from the same journal with an impact factor of 3.6.
at BEST these prove some correlation.
the third is from an online "journal" with an impact factor of 1. its an observation study. its about useful as toilet paper. well, no, toilet paper is more useful.
I am not stating whether "horse paste" has any affect on the virus or not, just that these studies dont prove anything.
at BEST these prove some correlation.
the third is from an online "journal" with an impact factor of 1. its an observation study. its about useful as toilet paper. well, no, toilet paper is more useful.
I am not stating whether "horse paste" has any affect on the virus or not, just that these studies dont prove anything.
Posted on 3/15/22 at 11:35 am to Jack Ruby
Why the frick are people downvoting this? There that many hideous people on this site that miss government tyranny and death?
Posted on 3/15/22 at 11:42 am to PureBlood
quote:
Why the frick are people downvoting this? There that many hideous people on this site that miss government tyranny and death?
Na. I'm convinced its bots. This forum has been flooded with so many idiots since the election for it not to be
Posted on 3/15/22 at 12:09 pm to jmon
quote:There's no "horse" Ivermectin. It's just Ivermectin. You can put some big Ibuprofen in a bottle with a horse on the label, but it's still just Ibuprofen
horse ivermectin
Posted on 3/15/22 at 12:18 pm to caro81
quote:Explain how impact factor affects the validity of the paper.
impact factor of 3.6.
Posted on 3/15/22 at 12:28 pm to WildManGoose
quote:
Explain how impact factor affects the validity of the paper.
I'll assume this is an honest question and not a half arse dig. theoretically it doesn't, realistically it does.
impact factor is a gauge of how much weight the journal has to the scientific community. The lower the impact, the lower its importance to the general community. That's not to say a low impact is bad. if youre in a very small field, lets say, the research involving left pinky fingers, you will likely be publishing in journals about left pinkies. the world in general, doesnt give a shite, or atleast, not a lot of shits about left pinkies. You could publish the most profound article on left pinkies in the history of left pinkies, but more than likely, youre going to still have a low impact.
now lets look the topic at hand. Infectious disease. kinda a big topic right? COVID to boot, also, right now, kinda a hot topic no? So if these articles were actually worth a damn, dont you think a journal with higher impact would be interested? Nature, probably the most influential scientific publication has an impact of 50.
then lets specifically talk about the 3rd article. published in an online journal with almost no impact. these are circle jerking communities who will publish literally anything. often times the authors themselves pay to have it published. they are simply facets for people to pad their CV and anyone with half a brain who see's something like that knows to immediately toss it into the trash bin.
Posted on 3/15/22 at 12:34 pm to WildManGoose
quote:
It's just Ivermectin.
Ok, still looking for an answer to the original question.
So, were people going to a pet and farm supply outlet and dosing based upon Facebook guidelines?
Posted on 3/15/22 at 12:40 pm to joe_cotton
quote:
how come when trump was being treated for Covid he got none of that.
Trump got monoclonal antibodies (Regeneron specifically) and a multitude of other treatments I'm sure. Ivermectin and HCQ are both good, cheap treatments before you have full-blown covid.
quote:
Time to move along and let the real scientists work.
Oh boy this is rich. Which scientists are you talking about? The one's who get grants from the federal gov?
Posted on 3/15/22 at 1:11 pm to caro81
quote:It was a half arse dig because
I'll assume this is an honest question and not a half arse dig
quote:
theoretically it doesn't
But, now I feel bad because you typed up a nice, informative response.
Posted on 3/15/22 at 1:15 pm to Jack Ruby
I used Ivermectin for prophylaxis and once I got Covid and still was the sickest I have ever been for just over 2 weeks but I didn't die which is good!
Posted on 3/15/22 at 1:28 pm to Jack Ruby
Whether this stuff really works or doesn't (I'm not a doctor and I have never had a personal encounter so all I have to go on is stuff on the internet) this is all you need to know about why there has been such a smear campaign against it.
quote:
It's costs about 3 cents per dose
Posted on 3/15/22 at 1:39 pm to caro81
quote:
now lets look the topic at hand. Infectious disease. kinda a big topic right? COVID to boot, also, right now, kinda a hot topic no? So if these articles were actually worth a damn, dont you think a journal with higher impact would be interested? Nature, probably the most influential scientific publication has an impact of 50.
then lets specifically talk about the 3rd article. published in an online journal with almost no impact. these are circle jerking communities who will publish literally anything. often times the authors themselves pay to have it published. they are simply facets for people to pad their CV and anyone with half a brain who see's something like that knows to immediately toss it into the trash bin
So your posts ITT trying to get people to discount the studies aren’t about the studies themselves? You’re talking about where they are published.
Ad hominem
Page 9 of 10
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News