re: See, the animals are gay too

quote:

---

You can't answer because you know where it goes.

---

He can’t answer because he is not very bright.

The clue that Displaced is out of his element and unable to defend his argument logically is when he starts replying with the term “sport.”

quote:

---

You posted this

---

Right, a definition. It shouldn't be controversial to expect people to communicate with accuracy.

I didn't stop it anywhere. I'm advocating that we all use the term correctly.

My only point is that the terms natural and normal are used incorrectly.

Your problem is that you're missing a ton of context, whether intentionally or unintentionally. Perhaps this is the first time you've ever participated in a discussion about the morality of homosexuality in humans. Somehow, I don't think that's the case, so I must conclude that it's intentional, and I think we both know why.

quote:

---

morality of homosexuality in humans.

---

Ahhhh. So you are saying it's natural because there is morality involved.

So you're like everyone else.

There is no space for morality in your definition of natural.

So a bunch of weirdos and their love for gay beastiality?

He’s obv gay too.

Yeah you posted a definition.

1. existing in or caused by nature; not made or caused by humankind.

You can't have missing context in a definition.then it's an idea and not a defined thing.

So why does the morality of homosexuality matter when defining natural acts?


I would say there is a morality in natural acts, because there is natural law, so I don't disagree with you. But your point is that natural has nothing to do with morality or opinion or ideas and ONLY existence itself.

Well theoretically I agree with the take in structure.

But what is the "morality if homosexuality" and why does it matter when talking about what is natural?

Because then your point is that there is an esoteric "morality of homosexuality" in the universe, defined by... something... that is embedded in the definition of nature, somehow, and determines that it's not always appropriate where you put your weiner. But sometimes it's ok.



In my view, there is a morality involved, an immorality, and it isn't natural because it doesn't follow natural law. I accept that the idea of natural does actually involve other concepts

You seemingly want to have your cake and eat it too.